Thursday, March 10, 2011

Shakespeare and Little Women

Let's take a quick step away from Germany and from Hamlet and look at something different for a while.  In my other English class this semester we are currently reading Little Women by Louisa May Alcott, a novel, I will admit, I had not read before.  Maybe it's the title or the fact that the author is a woman writing about a family of sisters, but it seems whenever this novel is mentioned it is discussed as a breakthrough work of feminism and of women's studies.
Because the protagonist, Jo, is such an independent woman through much of the novel, doing things that are not traditionally acceptable for women, such as writing and being at times the sole breadwinner for the family, this novel is often hailed as a progressive novel challenging traditional women's roles in society.  Yet, as I read the novel I found an interesting similarity between the female characters in Little Women and the female characters in Shakespeare:  they all end up either married or dead.

Specifically, I will compare two characters from Little Women, Jo and Beth, with two characters from Shakespeare, Katherine from Taming of the Shrew and Cordelia from King Lear.



Jo and Kate are indeed very similar characters.  Both are headstrong, independent women who do not like to be dominated or controlled by men or the society in which they live.  They take on roles that are not traditionally female: Kate as the shrew and Jo as the surrogate 'man of the house'.
And what happens to these two forward-thinking women?  They end up 'tamed' and married.  For all of their feminism, they conform to the societal norms and find themselves husbands.

Beth and Cordelia may seem like totally unrelated characters, but I see a similarity here.  Both are believed to be the 'dutiful daughter', the perfect example of what women should be, obedient and rarely thinking of themselves.  But where does this selflessness leave them?  What is their reward for being 'good' women?  They are both killed for their righteousness:  Beth contracts scarlet fever while helping a poor, sick family, and Cordelia is killed for remaining loyal to King Lear.

So, what does this say about the role of women?  In society can women be anything other than married or dead?  Are these the only two options for a 'good' woman?

Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I wouldn't have thought of comparing these, but you do have a point. It seems like I came across an argument in a book about Little Women about how Beth is proof that there isn't really a place in the world for a woman as good as her, so she had to die... or something like that. The idea that women can only be truly good if the get married or die is rather unsettling, but you could probably make a good case that that is the message in a fair number of books.
That is a good point, David. It seems like Jo tries to assert her independence for a while, at least, since she refuses Laurie, the rich, young suitor, and goes to the city to teach. It isn't until she has had the experience of being a writer and living on her own that she falls in love with Dr. Bahr, who is very poor and older. And we don't actually know if Kate really is "tamed" in the end or not. So maybe these women married because they wanted to, and not because of pressure. You have a good point though...last weekend I watched "True Grit" and in the end the main girl grows up and never marries. I had to admit that I was kind of miffed: you want the protagonist to find love! But I think we are so programmed to think that way that we can't accept any other outcome for a women...weird.

Post a new comment

Comments by